From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Ryan Pedela <rpedela(at)datalanche(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions |
Date: | 2015-07-17 14:11:40 |
Message-ID: | 55A90D1C.2040000@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/17/2015 08:20 AM, Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote:
> > This patch makes Postgres core more complex
>
> Yes, it does. But, that was not the purpose, obviously. :-)
>
> > while not really solving the problem in Javascript.
>
> It still allows for less risk of silent data corruption on the js side.
>
>
I have already pointed out how this patch is fundamentally broken. You
can achieve your aims by a fairly small amount of code inside your
logical decoder, and with no core code changes whatsoever. So I'm
puzzled why we are even still debating this broken design.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2015-07-17 14:16:21 | Re: pgsql: Retain comments on indexes and constraints at ALTER TABLE ... TY |
Previous Message | Fabien | 2015-07-17 13:50:06 | pgbench stats per script & other stuff |