> That note has been there forever, in particular since before we
> supported CONCURRENTLY, which is pretty darn important in many uses
> nowadays. Since it seems like some users have taken this suggestion
> seriously, e.g. on stackoverflow[1], how about we remove this outdated
> suggestion? There is already a previous mention a few sections
> earlier[2] suggesting the use of CONCURRENTLY, so I don't think we
> really need to reiterate that suggestion here.
+1
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com