Re: Outdated note about unique indexes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Outdated note about unique indexes
Date: 2015-08-31 21:05:41
Message-ID: 20150831210540.GC17858@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 03:10:46PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > That note has been there forever, in particular since before we
> > supported CONCURRENTLY, which is pretty darn important in many uses
> > nowadays. Since it seems like some users have taken this suggestion
> > seriously, e.g. on stackoverflow[1], how about we remove this outdated
> > suggestion? There is already a previous mention a few sections
> > earlier[2] suggesting the use of CONCURRENTLY, so I don't think we
> > really need to reiterate that suggestion here.
>
> +1

Patch applied through 9.5.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-09-02 01:15:16 Re: Wrong Typo
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2015-08-31 12:08:15 Re: small fix for pgprewarm.sgml