Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date: 2015-07-01 20:57:06
Message-ID: 55945422.7090708@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 07/01/2015 01:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> At the very least I think we should start to rely on 'static inline's
>> working. There is not, and hasn't been for a while, any buildfarm animal
>> that does not support it
>
> pademelon doesn't.

Other reasoning aside, pademelon is running an HPUX version that is 10
years old. I don't think we should care.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oskari Saarenmaa 2015-07-01 21:01:44 Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-07-01 20:54:34 Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6