| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Date: | 2015-07-01 21:09:06 |
| Message-ID: | 12418.1435784946@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On 07/01/2015 01:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>>> At the very least I think we should start to rely on 'static inline's
>>> working. There is not, and hasn't been for a while, any buildfarm animal
>>> that does not support it
>> pademelon doesn't.
> Other reasoning aside, pademelon is running an HPUX version that is 10
> years old. I don't think we should care.
Try 16. The reason I run it is not because anyone cares about actually
running Postgres on such a machine; it's just so that we will know when
we are breaking compatibility with ancient C compilers. I brought it up
merely to refute Andres' claim that we do not have buildfarm coverage
of the case.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-07-01 21:39:06 | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-07-01 21:07:16 | Re: 9.6 commitfest schedule |