Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule
Date: 2015-06-08 19:43:21
Message-ID: 5575F059.5090904@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 06/08/2015 12:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> If we release on Friday that is the 12th, PgCon is starts the 16th and there
>> is a weekend in between. If there is an unknown regression or new bug that
>> is severe, are we going to have the resources to resolve it?
>
> ISTM if that happens, we're no worse off than currently.

Technically sure, reputation?

If we really want to do this, let's do it. I am not trying to throw a
wrench into things. I just really don't want to have to go back, yet again.

Sincerely,

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-08 19:48:23 Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-08 19:31:51 Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule