Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule
Date: 2015-06-08 19:48:23
Message-ID: 20150608194823.GQ133018@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 06/08/2015 12:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >
> >Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >>If we release on Friday that is the 12th, PgCon is starts the 16th and there
> >>is a weekend in between. If there is an unknown regression or new bug that
> >>is severe, are we going to have the resources to resolve it?
> >
> >ISTM if that happens, we're no worse off than currently.
>
> Technically sure, reputation?

Well, reputation-wise we're already losing every time somebody's server
crashes on 9.4.2 and finds it won't start, where it did start fine with
9.4.1. Maybe they simply wanted to change shared_buffers and the server
won't start anymore. Some people even update binaries with the server
running; if they don't restart immediately, it could be several days
before it fails to start. It's pretty scary.

> If we really want to do this, let's do it. I am not trying to throw a wrench
> into things. I just really don't want to have to go back, yet again.

Sure, me neither.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2015-06-08 19:50:40 reaper should restart archiver even on standby
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-06-08 19:43:21 Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule