Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Date: 2015-06-01 21:57:27
Message-ID: 556CD547.9040308@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/1/15 4:42 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
>> Also ... if we were to rename it, it should be "pg_wal" or "pg_xact".
>> Please let's not add yet another term for the WAL.

I like pg_wal. It's correct and suitably mysterious.

--
- David Steele
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2015-06-01 22:03:48 Re: Multixid hindsight design
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-06-01 21:47:47 Re: nested loop semijoin estimates