Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Date: 2015-06-01 22:08:35
Message-ID: 20150601220835.GA26886@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 05:57:27PM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> On 6/1/15 4:42 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> >> Also ... if we were to rename it, it should be "pg_wal" or "pg_xact".
> >> Please let's not add yet another term for the WAL.
>
> I like pg_wal. It's correct and suitably mysterious.

+1

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2015-06-01 22:22:53 Re: nested loop semijoin estimates
Previous Message Greg Stark 2015-06-01 22:03:48 Re: Multixid hindsight design