Re: Enums again

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Enums again
Date: 2005-11-08 15:08:55
Message-ID: 5551.1131462535@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Huh, why not have the actual values in a separate catalog like
>> pg_enumvalues or some such?

> Sure, could do that. I don't have strong feelings either way.

I'd vote for the separate catalog instead of bloating pg_type.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2005-11-08 15:16:07 Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-08 15:06:38 Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload