| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Enums again |
| Date: | 2005-11-08 15:21:04 |
| Message-ID: | 4370C260.2000701@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Huh, why not have the actual values in a separate catalog like
>>>pg_enumvalues or some such?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Sure, could do that. I don't have strong feelings either way.
>>
>>
>
>I'd vote for the separate catalog instead of bloating pg_type.
>
>
>
>
Ok, consider that a done deal. Any other tweaks?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Creager | 2005-11-08 15:21:07 | Re: [Pgsphere-dev] Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2005-11-08 15:16:07 | Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload |