From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, sysadmins <sysadmins(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [sysadmins] Moving psqlodbc from pgfoundry to github |
Date: | 2015-01-16 21:39:58 |
Message-ID: | 54B9852E.7080601@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
On 01/16/2015 10:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 01/16/2015 07:31 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> As long as this is just static files (which it looks like from a quick
>> check, but I haven't actually looked deeper), then I see no problem at
>> all
>> with this.
>
> It's just static HTML. I've had some plans on switching to using Jekyll
> or something similar to generate them, though. They would still be
> served as static HTML, but it would require jekyll to run on the server,
> to generate the HTML files from the sources in the git. That would be
> OK, I presume? IIRC the JDBC site is generated like that too.
jekyll is already installed on the VM odbc.postgresql.org is on - so no
that is not a problem(as long as we can stick to the version in debian
wheezy)
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-01-18 17:44:41 | Re: [sysadmins] Moving psqlodbc from pgfoundry to github |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-01-16 21:34:20 | Re: [sysadmins] Moving psqlodbc from pgfoundry to github |