From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)ilande(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Commitfest problems |
Date: | 2014-12-15 19:52:35 |
Message-ID: | 548F3C03.6070403@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/15/2014 11:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I feel like we used to be better at encouraging people to participate
> in the CF even if they were not experts, and to do the best they can
> based on what they did know. That was a helpful dynamic. Sure, the
> reviews weren't perfect, but more people helped, and reviewing some of
> the patch well and some of it in a more cursory manner is way better
> than reviewing none of it at all.
Well, it was strongly expressed to me by a number of senior contributors
on this list and at the developer meeting that inexpert reviews were not
really wanted, needed or helpful. As such, I stopped recruiting new
reviewers (and, for that matter, doing them myself). I don't know if
the same goes for anyone else.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-12-15 20:05:58 | Re: Commitfest problems |
Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2014-12-15 19:39:03 | Re: Minor binary-search int overflow in timezone code |