| From: | Maila Fatticcioni <mfatticcioni(at)mbigroup(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: High Availability Cluster |
| Date: | 2014-11-27 16:33:24 |
| Message-ID: | 54775254.8070805@mbigroup.it |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/27/2014 12:34 PM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
> Maila Fatticcioni <mfatticcioni(at)mbigroup(dot)it> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hello. I need to set up a high availability cluster with two
>> servers. I have looked for the best configuration I could use but
>> I cannot find anything I like. I cannot used the DRBD option and
>> I have to use
>>
>> I was wondering if there is another way to set up a complete
>> cluster that would manage in case of failure:
>>
>> * the relocation of the VIP (virtual ip address) * the relocation
>> of the main instance of Postgresql
>>
>> Best Regards, Maila Fatticcioni
>
> Why not DRBD & Pacemaker?
>
>
> Andreas
>
We would prefer to not use DRBD to speed up the performance.
Is there any other available solution?
Maila
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlR3UlMACgkQi2q3wPb3FcNA9gCfd/veNBuNkmPSIbjdkHqeRdgK
CDMAoLul8+oO6CI9L9/7uCMlblLab9qP
=9OrT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Diego Miranda | 2014-11-27 20:21:00 | Compatibility module for Oracles dbms_sql |
| Previous Message | rob stone | 2014-11-27 16:11:51 | Re: Avoiding deadlocks when performing bulk update and delete operations |