Re: High Availability Cluster

From: Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: High Availability Cluster
Date: 2014-11-27 11:34:40
Message-ID: 20141127113440.GA23316@tux
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Maila Fatticcioni <mfatticcioni(at)mbigroup(dot)it> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello.
> I need to set up a high availability cluster with two servers. I have
> looked for the best configuration I could use but I cannot find
> anything I like. I cannot used the DRBD option and I have to use
>
> I was wondering if there is another way to set up a complete cluster
> that would manage in case of failure:
>
> * the relocation of the VIP (virtual ip address)
> * the relocation of the main instance of Postgresql
>
> Best Regards,
> Maila Fatticcioni

Why not DRBD & Pacemaker?

Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2014-11-27 11:49:18 Re: Avoiding deadlocks when performing bulk update and delete operations
Previous Message Maila Fatticcioni 2014-11-27 11:26:10 High Availability Cluster