From: | Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: High Availability Cluster |
Date: | 2014-11-27 11:34:40 |
Message-ID: | 20141127113440.GA23316@tux |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Maila Fatticcioni <mfatticcioni(at)mbigroup(dot)it> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello.
> I need to set up a high availability cluster with two servers. I have
> looked for the best configuration I could use but I cannot find
> anything I like. I cannot used the DRBD option and I have to use
>
> I was wondering if there is another way to set up a complete cluster
> that would manage in case of failure:
>
> * the relocation of the VIP (virtual ip address)
> * the relocation of the main instance of Postgresql
>
> Best Regards,
> Maila Fatticcioni
Why not DRBD & Pacemaker?
Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bill Moran | 2014-11-27 11:49:18 | Re: Avoiding deadlocks when performing bulk update and delete operations |
Previous Message | Maila Fatticcioni | 2014-11-27 11:26:10 | High Availability Cluster |