Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints
Date: 2021-05-09 23:51:13
Message-ID: 547012.1620604273@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2021-05-08 13:13:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (I wonder why flaviventris and serinus are still using an "experimental"
>> compiler version that is now behind mainstream.)

> The upgrade script didn't install the newer version it because it had to
> remove some conflicting packages... Should be fixed for runs starting
> now.

Looks like that didn't work ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-05-10 00:20:44 Re: Inherited UPDATE/DELETE vs async execution
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-05-09 23:36:16 Re: Non-reproducible valgrind failure on HEAD