Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints
Date: 2021-05-10 16:08:22
Message-ID: 20210510160822.ce4f4xvzga6pwnm4@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-05-09 19:51:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2021-05-08 13:13:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> (I wonder why flaviventris and serinus are still using an "experimental"
> >> compiler version that is now behind mainstream.)
>
> > The upgrade script didn't install the newer version it because it had to
> > remove some conflicting packages... Should be fixed for runs starting
> > now.
>
> Looks like that didn't work ...

Looks like it did, but turned out to have some unintended side-effects
:(.

The snapshot builds are now new:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=flaviventris&dt=2021-05-10%2015%3A43%3A56&stg=configure
configure:3966: ccache /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc --version >&5
gcc (Debian 20210421-1) 11.0.1 20210421 (prerelease) [gcc-11 revision fbb7739892e:d13ce34bd01:3756d99dab6a268d0d8a17583980a86f23f0595a]

But the aforementioned dependencies that needed to remove broke the
installed old versions of gcc/clang.

I started to build the old versions of llvm manually, but that then hits
the issue that at least 3.9 doesn't build with halfway modern versions
of gcc/clang. So I gotta do it stepwise (i.e. go backwards, build llvm
n-2 with n-1), will take a bit of time.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-05-10 16:14:46 Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-05-10 16:07:48 Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes?