| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Harris <michael(dot)harris(at)ericsson(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Centos 5 postgis2_92 packages |
| Date: | 2014-10-20 08:16:32 |
| Message-ID: | 5444C4E0.10400@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
On 10/20/2014 07:30 AM, Michael Harris wrote:
> Which part of the platform are you referring to there? I presume you don't mean the PG 9.2. Centos5 is not EOL until 2017. Or are you talking about the requirement to keep Postgis 2.0 users happy?
I was thinking of CentOS 5 in particular, but you're quite right -
looking at https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata, RH
describe RHEL 5 as actively supported at "production 3" (i.e. security
and critical fixes) level until early 2017.
That doesn't mean the PGDG has to provide community support for
PostgreSQL on the platform of course, but it makes more sense to do so
than if there was no ongoing support from Red Hat.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luitzen van Gorkum | 2014-10-20 09:40:51 | Secure and verified way to get the Postgresql RPM's |
| Previous Message | Michael Harris | 2014-10-19 23:30:47 | Re: Centos 5 postgis2_92 packages |