Re: Centos 5 postgis2_92 packages

From: Michael Harris <michael(dot)harris(at)ericsson(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Centos 5 postgis2_92 packages
Date: 2014-10-19 23:30:47
Message-ID: 30BC62DC16C7B842A8446ED8EB2F04393FBD0B0F@ESGSCMB105.ericsson.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum


>> Seems sensible; just Obsoletes: and Provides: it.
>>
>> I question how much effort should be spent on supporting such an extremely obsolete platform though.

Hi Craig

Which part of the platform are you referring to there? I presume you don't mean the PG 9.2. Centos5 is not EOL until 2017. Or are you talking about the requirement to keep Postgis 2.0 users happy?

Thanks,
Mike

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2014-10-20 08:16:32 Re: Centos 5 postgis2_92 packages
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2014-10-18 16:59:42 Re: Centos 5 postgis2_92 packages