| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] document |
| Date: | 2021-08-25 13:50:13 |
| Message-ID: | 543620.1629899413@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
> When I applied the patch to the master, I found that the table entries for
> those function were added into the table for aclitem functions in the docs.
> I think this is not valid position and needs to be moved to the proper one
> (maybe the table for system catalog information functions?).
You have to be very careful these days when applying stale patches to
func.sgml --- there's enough duplicate boilerplate that "patch' can easily
be fooled into dumping an addition into the wrong place. I doubt that
the submitter meant the doc addition to go there.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-08-25 13:56:56 | Re: prevent immature WAL streaming |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-08-25 13:49:18 | Re: Remove Value node struct |