Re: [PATCH] document

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] document
Date: 2021-08-25 13:21:36
Message-ID: 1ce86018-b180-d677-18d6-9f1e7d51976d@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/07/14 14:45, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 14:43 +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> The description for "pg_database" [1] mentions the function
>> "pg_encoding_to_char()", but this is not described anywhere in the docs. Given
>> that that it (and the corresponding "pg_char_to_encoding()") have been around
>> since 7.0 [2], it's probably not a burning issue, but it seems not entirely
>> unreasonable to add short descriptions for both (and link from "pg_conversion"
>> while we're at it); see attached patch. "System Catalog Information Functions"
>> seems the most logical place to put these.
>>
>> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/catalog-pg-database.html
>> [2] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=5eb1d0deb15f2b7cd0051bef12f3e091516c723b
>>
>> Will add to the next commitfest.
>
> +1

+1

When I applied the patch to the master, I found that the table entries for
those function were added into the table for aclitem functions in the docs.
I think this is not valid position and needs to be moved to the proper one
(maybe the table for system catalog information functions?).

+ <returnvalue>int</returnvalue>
+ <function>pg_encoding_to_char</function> ( <parameter>encoding</parameter> <type>int</type> )

It's better to s/int/integer because the entries for other functions
in func.sgml use "integer".

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-08-25 13:31:46 Re: Some RELKIND macro refactoring
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-08-25 13:19:49 Remove Value node struct