Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core?

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why isn't Java support part of Postgresql core?
Date: 2014-09-18 01:19:17
Message-ID: 541A3315.3070305@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/17/2014 5:02 PM, cowwoc wrote:
> As far as I understand it, this is the end-user's problem (to be
> documented) as opposed to a development problem. As far as I know, the
> jni.h files should be compatible with all other JDKs on the same
> platforms so you only need to release one DLL/SO per platforms (like
> you would if this was plain C) and it is then up to the user to make
> sure the Postgres process has the right JRE DLL/SO in its PATH.
>
> This shouldn't be too technically difficult to pull off.

right.

wait, which user? the java user/developer who typically hasn't a
clue how system-level stuff functions or operates, or the postgresql
database administrator, who probably hasn't a clue how java works
internally ?

--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2014-09-18 01:53:05 Re: encoding confusion with \copy command
Previous Message John DeSoi 2014-09-18 01:08:04 Re: encoding confusion with \copy command