| From: | Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Date: | 2014-09-02 21:47:26 |
| Message-ID: | 54063AEE.8090908@wi3ck.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/02/2014 04:16 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-09-02 19:06:02 +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote:
>> But what do you think about,
>> STRICT UPDATE ...?
>
> I quite dislike it. An UPDATE isn't less 'strict' (whatever that means)
> if updates more than one row. There's some sense in the way it's used
> for INTO because it's referring to the INTO. And it's much more obvious
> what it could mean there.
For once I completely agree with Andres.
Jan
--
Jan Wieck
Senior Software Engineer
http://slony.info
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-09-02 22:19:50 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Hernández Tortosa | 2014-09-02 21:47:04 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |