| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Date: | 2014-09-02 20:16:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20140902201655.GE28635@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-09-02 19:06:02 +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> But what do you think about,
> STRICT UPDATE ...?
I quite dislike it. An UPDATE isn't less 'strict' (whatever that means)
if updates more than one row. There's some sense in the way it's used
for INTO because it's referring to the INTO. And it's much more obvious
what it could mean there.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2014-09-02 20:17:02 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #10823: Better REINDEX syntax. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-09-02 20:15:30 | Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction |