From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kouber Saparev <kouber(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId |
Date: | 2015-11-27 19:33:48 |
Message-ID: | 5403.1448652828@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Kouber Saparev wrote:
>> Recently I spotted an auto vacuum that is constantly being run over a pg_toast table in the database. Interestingly the underlying table did not have that amount of writes that would trigger the auto vacuum every minute.
>>
>> When I tried to run the VACUUM manually it died with a non-existent MultiXactId error:
>>
>> db=# vacuum analyze verbose pg_toast.pg_toast_376621;
>> INFO: vacuuming "pg_toast.pg_toast_376621"
>> ERROR: MultiXactId 2915905228 does no longer exist -- apparent wraparound
> Hmm, I don't think there can be multixacts in toast tables at all,
> normally.
Couldn't creation and deletion of a toasted object within the same
transaction do it?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-11-27 19:53:28 | Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-11-27 18:49:36 | Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId |