Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kouber Saparev <kouber(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId
Date: 2015-11-27 19:53:28
Message-ID: 20151127195328.GE4320@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Kouber Saparev wrote:
> >> Recently I spotted an auto vacuum that is constantly being run over a pg_toast table in the database. Interestingly the underlying table did not have that amount of writes that would trigger the auto vacuum every minute.
> >>
> >> When I tried to run the VACUUM manually it died with a non-existent MultiXactId error:
> >>
> >> db=# vacuum analyze verbose pg_toast.pg_toast_376621;
> >> INFO: vacuuming "pg_toast.pg_toast_376621"
> >> ERROR: MultiXactId 2915905228 does no longer exist -- apparent wraparound
>
> > Hmm, I don't think there can be multixacts in toast tables at all,
> > normally.
>
> Couldn't creation and deletion of a toasted object within the same
> transaction do it?

I tried and couldn't find a way to cause one to appear. When a row is
created, it has xmax=0 so when it's deleted the xmax can just be set to
the deleting xact. And we don't ever update pg_toast rows, AFAIK.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-11-27 20:35:26 Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-11-27 19:33:48 Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId