From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Kouber Saparev <kouber(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId |
Date: | 2015-11-27 19:53:28 |
Message-ID: | 20151127195328.GE4320@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Kouber Saparev wrote:
> >> Recently I spotted an auto vacuum that is constantly being run over a pg_toast table in the database. Interestingly the underlying table did not have that amount of writes that would trigger the auto vacuum every minute.
> >>
> >> When I tried to run the VACUUM manually it died with a non-existent MultiXactId error:
> >>
> >> db=# vacuum analyze verbose pg_toast.pg_toast_376621;
> >> INFO: vacuuming "pg_toast.pg_toast_376621"
> >> ERROR: MultiXactId 2915905228 does no longer exist -- apparent wraparound
>
> > Hmm, I don't think there can be multixacts in toast tables at all,
> > normally.
>
> Couldn't creation and deletion of a toasted object within the same
> transaction do it?
I tried and couldn't find a way to cause one to appear. When a row is
created, it has xmax=0 so when it's deleted the xmax can just be set to
the deleting xact. And we don't ever update pg_toast rows, AFAIK.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-11-27 20:35:26 | Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-11-27 19:33:48 | Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId |