From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Policy query: sponsor endorsements |
Date: | 2014-08-27 16:55:06 |
Message-ID: | 53FE0D6A.6010605@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> The fact that EY in this case has had their logo and endorsement
> posted on every conference presentation the people they sponsored have
> made is not enough?
I'm not in a position to say. Seems pretty good to me. On the other
hand, I do have a quote from an EY person ...
>> We do want to "reward" companies for supporting PostgreSQL development,
>> and have in the past noted which companies sponsored certain features.
>> Otherwise this source of development funding will dry up, and it's easy
>> enough for us to give a company a few lines on a web page.
>
> We have? Can you give an example, so we have something to compare to?
Yah, I'll dig.
> I agree it's easy, but you need to figure out exactly who deserves to
> be there. How man lines are 2ndquadrant going to get? Salesforce? EDB?
> VMWare? There needs to be some sort of criteria.
>
> Maybe something like "those things that are listed as major
> enhancements" would work for that - as long as that doesn't send us
> spiraling into a discussion about what gets to be listed under major
> enhancements...
Agreed.
Probably this also means we need to get to overhauling the sponsors page
post-haste.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-08-27 17:17:31 | Re: db-engines Ranking for PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2014-08-27 16:49:30 | Re: Policy query: sponsor endorsements |