Re: logfile character encoding

From: Kai Borgolte <Kai(dot)Borgolte(at)gmx(dot)de>
To: Holger(dot)Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis(at)it(dot)nrw(dot)de, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logfile character encoding
Date: 2014-08-18 14:51:31
Message-ID: 53F212F3.3000504@gmx.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Am 18.08.2014 15:31, schrieb Holger(dot)Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis(at)it(dot)nrw(dot)de:

> Wikipedia says that UTF-8 is code page 65001, in Microsoft notation (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_page) Does this help in any way (i.e. does German_Germany.65001 work for you)?

No, I tried that value yesterday, see my answer to Adrian.

It seems Unicode encodings are just not target of Windows Locales. Which
in my opinion is reasonable: Why should it be a localization issue, how
a program writes Unicode to a file? When a localized Windows suggests
two different 8bit-charsets for usage (ANSI and OEM), this doesn't
hinder a program to write Unicode. Why can't PostgreSQL "Postmaster" do it?
--
Kai Borgolte, Bonn

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Redoute 2014-08-18 15:00:05 Re: logfile character encoding
Previous Message Dorian Hoxha 2014-08-18 14:28:23 select top_countries and for each country, select top_cities in that country, in 1 query