Re: 9.4 pg_control corruption

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, 李海龙 <hailong(dot)li(at)qunar(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "steve(at)ssinger(dot)info" <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>
Subject: Re: 9.4 pg_control corruption
Date: 2014-07-27 18:15:21
Message-ID: 53D541B9.1030403@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/27/2014 09:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?utf-8?B?5p2O5rW36b6Z?= <hailong(dot)li(at)qunar(dot)com> writes:
>> I have a PostgreSQL datadir named /export/pg94beta1_data/ which was
>> initialized with PostgreSQL 9.4beta1,
>> [ and 9.4beta2 won't start with it ]
>
> This is expected; you need to initdb. Or use pg_upgrade to upgrade
> the cluster. We had to change pg_control format post-beta1.

Thank you for testing that though!

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-07-27 19:34:15 Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
Previous Message 李海龙 2014-07-27 16:56:02 Re: 9.4 pg_control corruption