| From: | 李海龙 <hailong(dot)li(at)qunar(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "steve(at)ssinger(dot)info" <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.4 pg_control corruption |
| Date: | 2014-07-27 16:56:02 |
| Message-ID: | 53D52F21.3090505@qunar.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Understand!
Before I wrote last email, I had initialized a new db with PostgreSQL
9.4beta2 and restored the pg_dumpall data of /export/pg94beta1_data/
Thanks
Best Regards!
at 2014-07-28 00:35 +08, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?utf-8?B?5p2O5rW36b6Z?= <hailong(dot)li(at)qunar(dot)com> writes:
>> I have a PostgreSQL datadir named /export/pg94beta1_data/ which was
>> initialized with PostgreSQL 9.4beta1,
>> [ and 9.4beta2 won't start with it ]
> This is expected; you need to initdb. Or use pg_upgrade to upgrade
> the cluster. We had to change pg_control format post-beta1.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-07-27 18:15:21 | Re: 9.4 pg_control corruption |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-07-27 16:35:49 | Re: 9.4 pg_control corruption |