Volumes vs. UFS storage

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-pkg-docker(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Volumes vs. UFS storage
Date: 2014-07-14 19:02:04
Message-ID: 53C4292C.20404@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-docker

Tianon, Yosif:

Another development vs. production question we have is configuring the
main package to have a volume "option". For production installations,
users are going to want to put $PGDATA on a volume linked to a specific
local drive location, but users running automated tests will not want to
(as well as users who don't care about DB performance).

Thoughts on this?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

Responses

Browse pgsql-pkg-docker by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tianon Gravi 2014-07-14 19:04:00 Re: Packages instead of Source
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-07-14 18:59:56 Re: Packages instead of Source