| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-pkg-docker(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Packages instead of Source |
| Date: | 2014-07-14 18:59:56 |
| Message-ID: | 53C428AC.8040102@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-docker |
On 07/14/2014 11:54 AM, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> After discussing with Josh[1][2], we came up with an adjusted
> Dockerfile[3] so that it pulls from the official packages instead of
> building from source.
Doesn't this mean that we need to create a new github repo so that we're
not dragging along all 300MB of PostgreSQL source history?
> Functionally, it's still the same as the current image, so any current
> image users would be completely unaffected by this change unless
> they're taking advantage of the source being available to build
> extensions.
>
> I believe extensions are available as packages via this method, right?
> Regardless, this should still provide the headers and stuff so they
> should be able to clone the source separately and build the
> extensions?
Yes it should, let me look over the dependancies.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-07-14 19:02:04 | Volumes vs. UFS storage |
| Previous Message | Tianon Gravi | 2014-07-14 18:54:57 | Packages instead of Source |