| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical? |
| Date: | 2014-05-20 16:43:04 |
| Message-ID: | 537B8618.5050407@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
>>>> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
>>>> client utils? No?
>>>
>>> There are others who think this has already happened.
>>>
>>
>> Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical.
>
> It was named pg_receivelogical initially. Then people argued that that's
> too long and voted for pg_recvlogical. I renamed it even though I didn't
> particularly like the new name.
> I fail to see the point in renaming it again. And I haven't seen any
> concensus for doing so either.
Ah, I see. There was a name change, and I lost the argument. Got it.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2014-05-20 16:52:45 | rangetypes spgist questions/refactoring |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-05-20 16:38:09 | Re: I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical? |