| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical? |
| Date: | 2014-05-20 16:38:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20140520163809.GB864@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
> >> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
> >> client utils? No?
> >
> > There are others who think this has already happened.
> >
>
> Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical.
It was named pg_receivelogical initially. Then people argued that that's
too long and voted for pg_recvlogical. I renamed it even though I didn't
particularly like the new name.
I fail to see the point in renaming it again. And I haven't seen any
concensus for doing so either.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-05-20 16:43:04 | Re: I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-05-20 16:33:20 | Re: I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical? |