| From: | Antonin Houska <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor(at)pr(dot)hu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: Review: ECPG FETCH readahead |
| Date: | 2014-04-23 22:15:41 |
| Message-ID: | 53583B8D.50807@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/23/2014 05:24 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Antonin Houska wrote:
>> I haven't been too familiar with the ECPG internals so far but tried to
>> do my best.
>
> I'm afraid we're stuck on this patch until Michael has time to review
> it, or some other committer wants to acquire maintainership rights in
> the ECPG code.
>
Committer availability might well be the issue, but missing review
probably too.
Whether this review is enough to move the patch to "ready for committer"
- I tend to let the next CFM decide. (I don't find it productive to
ignite another round of discussion about kinds of reviews - already saw
some.)
// Tony
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2014-04-23 23:25:18 | Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table |
| Previous Message | Antonin Houska | 2014-04-23 22:06:48 | Re: Review: ECPG FETCH readahead |