From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor(at)pr(dot)hu> |
---|---|
To: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Antonin Houska <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead |
Date: | 2014-04-16 08:58:12 |
Message-ID: | 534E4624.1020007@pr.hu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-04-16 10:54 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
> 2014-01-18 18:08 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Boszormenyi Zoltan escribió:
>>>> Rebased patches after the regression test and other details were fixed
>>>> in the infrastructure part.
>>>
>>> This thread started in 2010, and various pieces have been applied
>>> already and some others have changed in nature. Would you please post a
>>> new patchset, containing rebased patches that still need application, in
>>> a new email thread to be linked in the commitfest entry?
>>
>> I hope Thunderbird did the right thing and didn't include the reference
>> message ID when I told it to "edit as new". So supposedly this is a new
>> thread but with all the cc: addresses kept.
>>
>> I have rebased all remaining patches and kept the numbering.
>> All the patches from 18 to 25 that were previously in the
>> "ECPG infrastructure" CF link are included here.
>>
>> There is no functional change.
>
> Because of the recent bugfixes in the ECPG area, the patchset
> didn't apply cleanly anymore. Rebased with no functional change.
The patches themselves are a little bigger though. It's because the
patches are generated with 10 lines of context, this was set in my
$HOME/.gitconfig:
[diff]
context = 10
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-04-16 08:58:23 | Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages? |
Previous Message | amulsul | 2014-04-16 08:56:25 | Re: The question about the type numeric |