Re: The question about the type numeric

From: amulsul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The question about the type numeric
Date: 2014-04-16 08:56:25
Message-ID: 1397638585996-5800219.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>But the sign is 0.
>So is there anything wrong?

have look in src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c @ 154 & 155 for POS & NEG
defination given as
154 #define NUMERIC_POS 0x0000
155 #define NUMERIC_NEG 0x4000

Regards,
Amul Sul

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/The-question-about-the-type-numeric-tp5800180p5800219.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2014-04-16 08:58:12 Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2014-04-16 08:54:48 Re: ECPG FETCH readahead