From: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | John Mudd <johnbmudd(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Debug strategy for musl Postgres? |
Date: | 2014-04-13 16:04:15 |
Message-ID: | 534AB57F.9000907@timbira.com.br |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 13-04-2014 00:40, John Mudd wrote:
> I built Postgres 9.3.4 from source on top of the musl C library,
> http://www.musl-libc.org/
> I also built zlib, bzip2, ncurses, openssl, readline and Python using musl
> as a foundation for Postgres.
>
This is not a bug. This kind of discussion belongs to -hackers.
While reading this email, I give musl a try. I'm using Debian jessie
which contains musl 1.0.0. I compiled the source (git master) using
CC="musl-gcc" and disabled zlib and readline. It passed all regression
tests. I also tried a pgbench which ran like a charm. (After installed
the binaries I had to set the libray path for musl in
/etc/ld-musl-x86_64.d.)
> I'm using musl to increase the portability of the Postgres binary. I build
> on Ubuntu 13.10 but will runs on older Linux boxes.
>
Could you give details about your architecture?
> For my next step I'll try building musl Postgres with the --enable-cassert
> option. What else can I do to debug this?
>
Is postgres running and listening 5432? Did you try another binaries
(eg. psql) or even postgres in single mode?
--
Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Mudd | 2014-04-13 20:04:34 | Re: Debug strategy for musl Postgres? |
Previous Message | lucybird | 2014-04-13 14:57:40 | BUG #10006: 'DO INSTEAD UPDATE' error |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-04-13 16:09:28 | Re: test failure on latest source |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-04-13 15:51:18 | Re: test failure on latest source |