| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Marco Atzeri <marco(dot)atzeri(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: test failure on latest source |
| Date: | 2014-04-13 15:51:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20140413155118.GR4161@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-04-12 16:35:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On 2014-04-12 19:45:59 +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> >> so it is only failing on recent trunk
>
> > Does it work on a commit before
> > fc752505a99a4e2c781a070d3d42a25289c22e3c?
>
> In principle, that commit shouldn't have affected behavior for pg_hba
> entries with numeric address fields ...
Hm. getaddrinfo.c has this bit:
/* Unsupported flags. */
if (flags & NI_NAMEREQD)
return EAI_AGAIN;
Not sure if that explains anything, but it at the very least seems
problematic for other cases given that flag is now always used...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2014-04-13 16:04:15 | Re: Debug strategy for musl Postgres? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-04-13 15:44:39 | Re: Signaling of waiting for a cleanup lock? |