Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?
Date: 2014-04-07 06:15:38
Message-ID: 5342428A.6000506@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 04/02/2014 12:32 AM, Stefan Keller wrote:

> It also mentions an insert-only technique: "This approach has been
> adopted before in POSTGRES [21] in 1987 and was called "time-travel".
> I would be interested what "time-travel" is and if this is still used by
> Postgres.

Back in the old days, PostgreSQL never deleted any tuples. Rows were
deleted by writing the deletion time into a column. As a result, you
could go back to old data just by telling PostgreSQL to report rows
which where visible at a given time.

Obviously, this approach precluded use of PostgreSQL in many scenarios.
For example, you wouldn't want to use it as your web application
session store.

--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Keller 2014-04-07 08:29:33 Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?
Previous Message Francisco Olarte 2014-04-06 18:31:56 Re: Any way to insert rows with ID used in another column