From: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Brent Wood <Brent(dot)Wood(at)niwa(dot)co(dot)nz>, "bret_stern(at)machinemanagement(dot)com" <bret_stern(at)machinemanagement(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SSD Drives |
Date: | 2014-04-02 20:31:08 |
Message-ID: | 533C738C.2060007@optionshouse.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 04/02/2014 02:50 PM, Brent Wood wrote:
> http://it-blog.5amsolutions.com/2010/08/performance-of-postgresql-ssd-vs.html
While interesting, these results are extremely out of date compared to
current drives. Current chips and firmware regularly put out 2-10 times
better performance than even the best graphs on this page, depending on
what you buy.
We moved all of our performance-critical servers to NVRAM-based storage
years ago. For us, it was well worth the added expense.
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shaun Thomas | 2014-04-02 20:35:54 | Re: Bug in user pg_ident.conf mapping code? |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2014-04-02 20:27:56 | Re: Bug in user pg_ident.conf mapping code? |