| From: | Bret Stern <bret_stern(at)machinemanagement(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Brent Wood <Brent(dot)Wood(at)niwa(dot)co(dot)nz>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SSD Drives |
| Date: | 2014-04-02 21:55:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1396475719.2481.6.camel@developer.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Care to share the SSD hardware you're using?
I've used none to date, and have some critical data I would like
to put on a development server to test with.
Regards,
Bret Stern
On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 15:31 -0500, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> On 04/02/2014 02:50 PM, Brent Wood wrote:
>
> > http://it-blog.5amsolutions.com/2010/08/performance-of-postgresql-ssd-vs.html
>
> While interesting, these results are extremely out of date compared to
> current drives. Current chips and firmware regularly put out 2-10 times
> better performance than even the best graphs on this page, depending on
> what you buy.
>
> We moved all of our performance-critical servers to NVRAM-based storage
> years ago. For us, it was well worth the added expense.
>
> --
> Shaun Thomas
> OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
> 312-676-8870
> sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com
>
> ______________________________________________
>
> See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2014-04-02 21:57:09 | Re: Lock problem |
| Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2014-04-02 21:44:55 | Re: Lock problem |