Re: Replication Monitoring

From: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PGSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication Monitoring
Date: 2007-12-06 22:42:06
Message-ID: 532198.96354.qm@web25806.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

How did that happen? The subject is totally different, so is the
body.

This is shit.

--- Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> "Glyn Astill" <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>
> > Hi people,
> >
> > I intend to set up two slave servers, one using WAL shipping and
> one
> > using Slony I.
>
> This has nothing to do with "aggregate and ordering" the subject of
> the
> message to which you're replying. You're more likely to see
> responses if you
> post in a new thread.
>
> --
> Gregory Stark
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
> Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's
> PostgreSQL training!
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/
>

Glyn Astill

__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! - the World's favourite mail http://uk.mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glyn Astill 2007-12-06 22:43:43 Replication Monitoring
Previous Message Decibel! 2007-12-06 22:17:01 Re: storage size of "bit" data type..