Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available]

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available]
Date: 2008-01-09 12:35:01
Message-ID: 530B3FB9300DBC7A3DEEDC8A@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Wednesday, January 09, 2008 09:37:00 +0100 Magnus Hagander
<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> If that's so, then that's the problem. Because the first copy of this email
> was received *way* earlier than that. As in right after it was sent. Maybe
> you can get a bunch of the original headers fromt he MBOX files in the
> archives? (they have only one copy of it, but I'll bet it shows a
> completely different delivery time)

The archives would only have one copy ... its after it was written to the
archives that anything would have been duplicated ...

> Who generates the messageid? Devrim? majordomo? maia? Because I only see that
> exact messageid once (not ESMTP id here, actual message id
> "1199744552(dot)30375(dot)57(dot)camel(at)localhost(dot)localdomain") only shows up once in my
> logs. So the different copies of the mail was delivered with different
> messageids.

To the best of my knowledge, the message id its is generated by Devrim's system
... in fact, if you look at the headers of this 'thread', you will also see a
References header which is the message ids of other messages in this thread:

References: <4783956A(dot)9060800(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
<200801080726(dot)32233(dot)josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
<20080108154021(dot)GJ25881(at)svr2(dot)hagander(dot)net>
<C522C01EE1A0A98ECCF6D5C4(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>
MIME-Version: 1.0

And, from the message I'm responding to:

Message-ID: <20080109083700(dot)GA25870(at)svr2(dot)hagander(dot)net>

Notice that your domain name is in the @ part?

Now, I'm not 100% certain what happens if someone *re-injected* the message,
but suspect it would end up with a new message id .. which *could* explain what
happened (if we had headers to check) ... there are multiple moderators for the
list, so if someone re-injected the message a few times, th emoderators could
have re-approved each one without realizing they were doing it ...

... but, that woudln't explain why JoshB or I received multiple copies, just
you and JD, so I don't really consider that one a high probability, just low
possibility ... in fact, very low possibility, as we shoudl then see multiple
copies in the archives ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD4DBQFHhL914QvfyHIvDvMRAuOIAJiWbXw2fuVrjvfZp3QR992YId5RAJ4iDT8Q
XaOnvrmPk+veyRjPRaXzlg==
=ecci
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2008-01-09 12:37:03 Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available]
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-01-09 11:49:18 Re: Best Database