From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available] |
Date: | 2008-01-09 12:35:01 |
Message-ID: | 530B3FB9300DBC7A3DEEDC8A@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, January 09, 2008 09:37:00 +0100 Magnus Hagander
<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> If that's so, then that's the problem. Because the first copy of this email
> was received *way* earlier than that. As in right after it was sent. Maybe
> you can get a bunch of the original headers fromt he MBOX files in the
> archives? (they have only one copy of it, but I'll bet it shows a
> completely different delivery time)
The archives would only have one copy ... its after it was written to the
archives that anything would have been duplicated ...
> Who generates the messageid? Devrim? majordomo? maia? Because I only see that
> exact messageid once (not ESMTP id here, actual message id
> "1199744552(dot)30375(dot)57(dot)camel(at)localhost(dot)localdomain") only shows up once in my
> logs. So the different copies of the mail was delivered with different
> messageids.
To the best of my knowledge, the message id its is generated by Devrim's system
... in fact, if you look at the headers of this 'thread', you will also see a
References header which is the message ids of other messages in this thread:
References: <4783956A(dot)9060800(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
<200801080726(dot)32233(dot)josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
<20080108154021(dot)GJ25881(at)svr2(dot)hagander(dot)net>
<C522C01EE1A0A98ECCF6D5C4(at)ganymede(dot)hub(dot)org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
And, from the message I'm responding to:
Message-ID: <20080109083700(dot)GA25870(at)svr2(dot)hagander(dot)net>
Notice that your domain name is in the @ part?
Now, I'm not 100% certain what happens if someone *re-injected* the message,
but suspect it would end up with a new message id .. which *could* explain what
happened (if we had headers to check) ... there are multiple moderators for the
list, so if someone re-injected the message a few times, th emoderators could
have re-approved each one without realizing they were doing it ...
... but, that woudln't explain why JoshB or I received multiple copies, just
you and JD, so I don't really consider that one a high probability, just low
possibility ... in fact, very low possibility, as we shoudl then see multiple
copies in the archives ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD4DBQFHhL914QvfyHIvDvMRAuOIAJiWbXw2fuVrjvfZp3QR992YId5RAJ4iDT8Q
XaOnvrmPk+veyRjPRaXzlg==
=ecci
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-01-09 12:37:03 | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available] |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-01-09 11:49:18 | Re: Best Database |