| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available] |
| Date: | 2008-01-09 14:09:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20080109140911.GA4651@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Now, I'm not 100% certain what happens if someone *re-injected* the message,
> but suspect it would end up with a new message id .. which *could* explain what
> happened (if we had headers to check) ... there are multiple moderators for the
> list, so if someone re-injected the message a few times, th emoderators could
> have re-approved each one without realizing they were doing it ...
Note that when a duplicated message is sent to a moderator, the
moderation notice says so -- "Partial duplicate checksum" or something
like that. I have noticed a couple of idiotic mail systems reinjecting
old mail that way.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | User Scrappy | 2008-01-09 18:12:18 | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available] |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2008-01-09 14:07:27 | Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL RPM Yum repository is available] |