| From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, Denis Rouzaud <denis(dot)rouzaud(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL in Debian <pgsql-pkg-debian(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Markus Engel <markus(at)fsing(dot)fs(dot)uni-sb(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: pgdg GDAL version |
| Date: | 2014-01-30 10:56:13 |
| Message-ID: | 52EA2FCD.8060307@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-debian |
On 01/25/2014 10:16 PM, Christoph Berg wrote:
>> The short story is, PGDG apt repository for Debian/Ubuntu PostGIS
>> 2.1 is based on GDAL 1.9,
>> while UbuntuGIS-unstable and related repos are based on GDAL 1.10
>> with updated drivers.
I think the easiest way forward might be to recompile postgis on that
mixture of additional packages from different repositories. That will
get you a postgis package compiled against a gdal 1.10 and for all
supported Postgres versions.
> One way that could work was to look into what the osgeo people have
> done to get postgis working.
Is ubuntu-gis even related to osgeo?
Anyways, I don't think there's much to be done to get postgis working.
It should build (and then work) with both, gdal 1.9 and 1.10. However,
the package and linking dependencies need to match with the rest of your
repositories.
In a way, the ubuntu-gis repo just isn't compatible to the pgapt one.
(Nor is osgeo, for that matter.) At least that's my way of thinking
about it.
Regards
Markus Wanner
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Denis Rouzaud | 2014-01-30 11:02:15 | Re: pgdg GDAL version |
| Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2014-01-29 17:56:45 | Re: debversion extension for PG9.3 |