From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Time to do our Triage for 9.4 |
Date: | 2014-01-08 18:45:37 |
Message-ID: | 52CD9CD1.7030409@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hackers,
Per the Developer Meeting, we are scheduled to do a final triage of 9.4
patches the week before CF4 starts, which is *now*. The goal of this
triage is to divide patches already in queue into 5 groups:
1) Good To Go: patches which are 100% ready for final testing and commit.
2) Needs a Little Work: smaller patches which can be included in 9.4 if
they get a few hours of love from a committer or major hacker.
3) Big Patches: big, important patches which will need a major time
committement to commit even though they are 90% ready, just due to size.
4) Not Nearly Ready: Patches which need major work and/or spec
discussions before commitment.
5) WIP: any patch which is acknowledged just there for review, or any
brand-new patch which wasn't in CF3 and is non-trivial.
Obviously, any patches in groups 4 and 5 aren't going into 9.4. The
idea is to handle patches in CF4 in this order:
1. do immediately
2. do after (1) is complete
3. assign 1 senior hacker reviewer to each patch
4. review as time permits after 1-3
5. review as time permits after 1-3
Let the triage begin!
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-01-08 18:51:27 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] IMCS: In Memory Columnar Store for PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-01-08 18:32:27 | Re: WIP patch: improve documentation for user defined final functions of aggregates |