From: | "Inoue, Hiroshi" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Mike Landl <mlandl(at)4glsol(dot)com>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: psqlodbcw.so vs libodbcpsql.so |
Date: | 2013-12-18 03:24:19 |
Message-ID: | 52B11563.3080503@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Hi Mike,
(2013/12/17 4:36), Mike Landl wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Apologies if this a simple and/or naïve question but what exactly is the
> difference between psqlodbcw.so and libodbcpsql.so?
>
> Obviously psqlodbcw.so is your driver but what exactly is libodbcpsql.so
> and do people still use it (I am using PostgreSQL 9.1.4 at the moment in
> case that is relevant information)? Maybe I haven’t been searching
> correctly but I haven’t been able to come up with much useful information.
>
> The reason I’m asking is because I have tried both and libodbcpsql.so
> seems to be approximately 5x faster in my tests. Are there known issues
> with this driver?
Are you disabling *per statement rollback on errors* functionality?
> I want to use your driver since I know it is actively being worked on
> and is the official ODBC driver for PostgreSQL but the speed differences
> are huge.
>
> If you need any more information from me (i.e. log files) just ask.
Could you send me directly the log files of your test case?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 1300 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan
http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Inoue, Hiroshi | 2013-12-18 03:24:44 | Re: Length of bytea |
Previous Message | Daniel Homerick | 2013-12-18 00:48:32 | Length of bytea |