From: | "Mike Landl" <mlandl(at)4glsol(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | psqlodbcw.so vs libodbcpsql.so |
Date: | 2013-12-16 19:36:50 |
Message-ID: | 00ba01cefa96$2b87edd0$8297c970$@com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Hi All,
Apologies if this a simple and/or naïve question but what exactly is the
difference between psqlodbcw.so and libodbcpsql.so?
Obviously psqlodbcw.so is your driver but what exactly is libodbcpsql.so and
do people still use it (I am using PostgreSQL 9.1.4 at the moment in case
that is relevant information)? Maybe I havent been searching correctly but
I havent been able to come up with much useful information.
The reason Im asking is because I have tried both and libodbcpsql.so seems
to be approximately 5x faster in my tests. Are there known issues with this
driver?
I want to use your driver since I know it is actively being worked on and is
the official ODBC driver for PostgreSQL but the speed differences are huge.
If you need any more information from me (i.e. log files) just ask.
Thanks.
Mike Landl
4GL Solutions
1020 Denison Street, Suite 101
Markham,ON L3R 3W5
Website: <http://www.4glsol.com/> www.4glsol.com
Phone: (905) 479-6727
Fax: (905) 479-1246
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG User | 2013-12-17 21:26:57 | support for keep alive option |
Previous Message | ljwilson | 2013-12-16 13:03:39 | Re: Windows Compile warnings: C4018 signed/unsigned mismatch and C4723 potential divide by 0 |