Re: Review: ECPG infrastructure changes part 1, was: Re: ECPG fixes

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Antonin Houska <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: Review: ECPG infrastructure changes part 1, was: Re: ECPG fixes
Date: 2013-12-16 15:52:56
Message-ID: 52AF21D8.1050901@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/6/13, 9:58 AM, Antonin Houska wrote:
> Tested git apply and build again. No warnings.
>
> The regression test also looks good to me now.
>
> I'm done with this review.
>
> (Not sure if I should move it to 'ready for committer' status or the CFM
> should do).

You should do that, but I'll do it now.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-12-16 16:14:15 Re: "stuck spinlock"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-12-16 15:38:43 Re: "stuck spinlock"